Wall Teichoic Acid Mediates Staphylococcus aureus Binding to Endothelial Cells via the Scavenger Receptor LOX-1.

The success of Staphylococcus aureus as a major cause for endovascular infections depends on effective interactions with blood-vessel walls. We have previously shown that S. aureus uses its wall teichoic acid (WTA), a surface glycopolymer, to attach to endothelial cells. However, the endothelial WTA receptor remained unknown. We show here that the endothelial oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LOX-1) interacts with S. aureus WTA and permits effective binding of S. aureus to human endothelial cells. Purified LOX-1 bound to isolated S. aureus WTA. Ectopic LOX-1 expression led to increased binding of S. aureus wild type but not of a WTA-deficient mutant to a cell line, and LOX-1 blockage prevented S. aureus binding to endothelial cells. Moreover, WTA and LOX-1 expression levels correlated with the efficacy of the S. aureus-endothelial interaction. Thus, LOX-1 is an endothelial ligand for S. aureus, whose blockage may help to prevent or treat severe endovascular infections.

Differential survival of Staphylococcal species in macrophages.

Staphylococcus aureus is considered an extracellular pathogen, yet the bacterium is able to survive within and escape from host cells. An agr/sae mutant of strain USA300 is unable to escape from macrophages but can replicate and survive within. We questioned whether such "non-toxic" S. aureus resembles the less pathogenic coagulase-negative Staphylococcal (CoNS) species like S. epidermidis, S. carnosus, S. lugdunensis, S. capitis, S. warneri, or S. pettenkoferi. We show that the CoNS are more efficiently killed in macrophage-like THP-1 cells or in human primary macrophages. Mutations in katA, copL, the regulatory system graRS, or sigB did not impact bacterial survival in THP-1 cells. Deletion of the superoxide dismutases impaired S. aureus survival in primary macrophages but not in THP-1 cells. However, expression of the S. aureus-specific sodM in S. epidermidis was not sufficient to protect this species from being killed. Thus, at least in those cells, better bacterial survival of S. aureus could not be linked to higher protection from ROS. However, "non-toxic" S. aureus was found to be insensitive to pH, whereas most CoNS were protected when phagosomal acidification was inhibited. Thus, species differences are at least partially linked to differences in sensitivity to acidification.